[isoc-members-discuss] Policeware and SPAM

chiari mario chiari.hm a FLASHNET.IT
Gio 29 Ago 2002 19:56:27 CEST


un contributo alla discussione sullo spam. m.
F Baker  il nuovo Presidente ISOC


>X-Sender: fred a mira-sjcm-4.cisco.com
>X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1.1
>To: isoc-members-discuss a isoc.org
>From: Fred Baker <fred a cisco.com>
>Subject: Re: [isoc-members-discuss] Policeware and SPAM
>Sender: isoc-members-discuss-admin a isoc.org
>X-BeenThere: isoc-members-discuss a isoc.org
>X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.8
>List-Unsubscribe:
<http://www.isoc.org/mailman/listinfo/isoc-members-discuss>,
>       <mailto:isoc-members-discuss-request a isoc.org?subject=unsubscribe>
>List-Id: Members Discussion List <isoc-members-discuss.isoc.org>
>List-Post: <mailto:isoc-members-discuss a isoc.org>
>List-Help: <mailto:isoc-members-discuss-request a isoc.org?subject=help>
>List-Subscribe: <http://www.isoc.org/mailman/listinfo/isoc-members-discuss>,
>       <mailto:isoc-members-discuss-request a isoc.org?subject=subscribe>
>List-Archive: <http://www.isoc.org/mailman/private/isoc-members-discuss/>
>Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2002 08:46:02 -0700
>
>At 10:14 AM 8/19/2002 -0400, Brian Bisaillon wrote:
>>What do you think about the following issue?
>>http://stoppoliceware.org/cbdtpa_bill_text.php
>
..................
>
>>Another interesting issue is SPAM. It is clearly an accountability problem
>>but how can any one country impose legislation to stop it?
>
>The first issue is in deciding what to stop: my spam may be your important
>communication. Is, for example, a call for papers for an academic
>conference "spam", by virtue of having been sent to many relevant mailing
>lists? Is an email posted to a large list such as the IETF list spam by
>virtue of being widely delivered? If a cruise line posts a message to me
>personally, in the process of sending similar emails to a large number of
>other people, is that spam? In order to provide a technical solution, we
>need something that is technically identifiable; that calls for a fairly
>crisp definition of the term.
>
>My concern in this regard tends to be with unsolicited commercial email
>(the cruise line example), especially that which I find offensive. But in
>that statement, I find the definition sufficiently loose that I'm not sure
>I could either write a law or a bit of code to elide them from the network.
>



Maggiori informazioni sulla lista ita-pe